15260 WASHINGTON, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 this is a newer home on the north end of Elsinore. It's listed as a short sale so the bank may not go for the price. They bought it new in 2003 for $350k. They have obviously spent some money on this home, putting in a pool, patio, bbq and landscaping it. All that does not seem to matter and they have put the old ranch on the market as a short sale for $319k. $35k less than they paid 4 years ago and that does not factor in the cost of the pool and other upgrades. That's gotta sting a little, eh?
2003 rollbacks are easy to find, how long before 2002 rollbacks?
10481 Whitecrown Corona, CA 92883. This south Corona home was purchased in 2003 for $407k, sold in 2006 for $660 (for a very healthy profit, lucky seller). Unfortunately this buyer did not see the returns of the last one. Another sale was posted in June for $558k, I think this was probably the bank taking it back. If so it would have to be a 1st payment default. It's now listed for $399,900. $7k Less than the 03 price and $260k less than the 06 sales price. That's a 40% loss in ONE year!
Here's another 40% yearly loss. this one is not an 03 rollback since it was only built in 2005. Originally it sold new for $371k in 2005. This guys flips in in 06 for $485k making a quick $100k!, No bubble here folks, nothing to see, move along.... Unfortunately for the buyer history did not repeat itself. It does not indicate this is a REO or a short sale. If it isn't the poor owner is heading for the exits $186k poorer. $186k is a lot to spend to live in MoVal for a year and 4 months.
Here's another 40% yearly loss. this one is not an 03 rollback since it was only built in 2005. Originally it sold new for $371k in 2005. This guys flips in in 06 for $485k making a quick $100k!, No bubble here folks, nothing to see, move along.... Unfortunately for the buyer history did not repeat itself. It does not indicate this is a REO or a short sale. If it isn't the poor owner is heading for the exits $186k poorer. $186k is a lot to spend to live in MoVal for a year and 4 months.
38265 Placer Creek, Murrieta, CA 92562, this one sold new in 2001 for $239k, again in Dec 2003 for $405k and the last record is in July for $517k. My guess is that would be the bank taking it back. It's now listed for $369k.
7 comments:
WOW! That is some ass whuppin.
All these properties need to go down for another 100K, before I am going to move my fat-lazy renter ass and start getting serious. can we all say "ASS WHUPPIN will continue", I know you can...
Great finding golfer_x. I have a request for an area, how about Morgan Hill in Temecula. I know some snotty people over there, and just wondering how much fake asset they been losing. Thanks
Most of Temecula is back to 2003/4 prices. They have been crashing down there for almost 2 years now so they are a bit ahead of the rest of the IE. Morgan hill is a nicer area but it's falling just like the rest of Temecula. Here's a typical example
http://redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1225658
Ok that url did not copy across, try this one
http://tinyurl.com/2njkne
The link's fine, thanks. I will say that place has no change in hell to sell for that price, It would sell lower than the original price. Its good to see the price erosion over though, somebody used to tell me Morgan Hill is different its mostly retired or rich investor that don't need to sell and buy the property with at lot hard cash for down payment...LOL
Wow, I like your blog.. How about Chino Hills? What's your take on it?
-KC
Post a Comment